Who Has Copies of Wu-Tang Album? Shkreli Tells Judge He Doesn’t Know

Facing a federal court order to turn over all his copies of a rare Wu-Tang Clan album, Martin Shkreli is warning a judge that he can’t remember all the people with whom he shared the album – and that it’s “highly likely” that other people still have copies.

In August, Judge Pamela K. Chen ordered Shkreli to hand over any copies of Once Upon a Time in Shaolin, an ultra-rare Wu-Tang album that he once owned but was forced to forfeit to federal prosecutors to help pay restitution after he was convicted of securities fraud.

In a sworn statement on Monday, Shkreli promised the judge that he had turned over all copies that he could find in his possession. But he also said he didn’t know exactly who he had shared it with, and that some of them probably still have copies.

“Because I shared the musical work several times several years ago, I cannot recall each and every time that I have shared the musical work,” he told the judge. “It is possible, and indeed I find it highly likely, that one of the many people who viewed, heard, or otherwise accessed the musical work via my social media recorded the musical work and retains a copy of the same.” Best accident lawyer near me | Best Bankruptcy lawyers near me | Best Birth Injury lawyers near me | Bus Accident Lawyers Near Me | Best Car accident lawyer near me | Best Child custody lawyers near me | Child support lawyers near me | Best Copyright lawyers near me | Best Divorce lawyers near me | Best Criminal Defense Lawyers Near Me | Drunk driving accident lawyers near me | Best Dui Lawyers near me | Elder law Lawyers near me | Best Employment law Lawyers near me | Estate planning Lawyers near me | Best Family law Lawyers near me | Best Foreclosure Lawyers near me | Best Immigration Lawyers near me | Best Insurance claims Lawyers near me | Best Medical malpractice Lawyers near me | Best Mesothelioma Lawyers near me | | Nursing home abuse Lawyers near me | Best Personal injury Lawyers near me | Best Police brutality Lawyers near me | Best Probate Lawyers near meSexual harassment Lawyers near me | Best Social security disability Lawyers near me | Best Tax Lawyers near me | Best Truck accident Lawyers near me | Best Workers compensation Lawyers near me | Best Wrongful Death Lawyers near me

Wu-Tang’s fabled album was recorded in secret and published just once, on a CD secured in an engraved nickel and silver box. In addition to the bizarre trappings, Once Upon came with strict legal stipulations — namely, that the one-of-a-kind album could not be released to the general public until 2103.

In 2015, Shkreli — soon to become infamous as the man who intentionally spiked the price of crucial AIDS medications — bought Once Upon at auction for $2 million. But after he was convicted of securities fraud in 2017, he forfeited it to federal prosecutors to help pay his multi-million dollar restitution sentence. PleasrDAO, a collective of early NFT collectors and digital artists, then bought the album from the government in 2021 for $4 million, and in 2024 acquired the copyrights and other rights for another $750,000.

Amid recent efforts to monetize Once Upon, Pleasr sued Shkreli in June after he made threats to release the album publicly and destroy the exclusivity that the company had purchased. The lawsuit accused him of both breaching the federal forfeiture order and violating federal trade secrets law, which protects valuable proprietary information from misappropriation.

In August, Judge Chen granted Pleasr a preliminary injunction requiring Shkreli to hand over any copies of Once Upon that were still in his possession. His attorneys had argued Shkreli had the right to create private copies when he owned the album and could retain them even after he forfeited the original copy, but the judge rejected that argument.

Responding to the injunction order on Monday, Shkreli told the judge he had “searched my devices, electronic accounts, and other personal effects” and handed over any copies he owned. He swore that he had done so “under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America.”

But Judge Chen’s injunction also included another requirement: That he divulge the “names and contact information of the individuals to whom he distributed the data and files.” On that front, Shkreli offered less info on Monday.

“Between 2015 and 2021, I recall occasionally sharing the musical work, primarily by sending digital files of the musical work to others via email, [and] also saved copies of the musical work on USB or other drives and gave those drives to others,” Shkreli said, before saying that he “cannot recall” each of those occasions.

He also told the judge that he had “shared the musical work on my social media pages or livestreams” on at least three occasions, including once in 2023 and again in 2024. It was during these public postings, Shkreli said, that someone likely created copies of the album.

Both sides did not immediately return requests for comment on Monday’s filing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *