Read More:
- Criminal Defense Lawyers with Payment Plans in Ohio: What You Need to Know
- Miller Law Group vs USA Trusted Lawyers: Which California Law Firm Stands Out?
- Choosing Between The Barnes Firm and USA Trusted Lawyers in NYC: A Detailed Review
- Comparing San Diego Bus Accident Lawyers and Chicago Bus Accident Lawyers: What You Need to Know
- Top Tax Lawyers in Florida: Expert Legal Services for Your Tax Needs
| Case Name: | In re: Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation |
| Case Number: | No. 12-md-02311 |
| Verdict Date: | |
| Outcome Type: | Settlement |
| Court: | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION |
Plaintiff’s Complaint:
Each lawsuit claims that the Defendants in that lawsuit agreed to unlawfully raise the price of a certain kind of vehicle component part. (For example, one lawsuit is called In re: Radiators, and the affected product is radiators.) As a result of the alleged agreements by Defendants, consumers and businesses who purchased or leased qualifying new vehicles (not for resale) containing those parts or who indirectly purchased qualifying replacement parts (not for resale) from the Defendants may have paid more than they should have.
Injury, Damage, or Loss:
Click on this link to view the news release: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/time-is-running-out-for-consumers-and-businesses-to-get-100-or-more-from-over-1-2-billion-in-auto-parts-settlements-300961813.html?tc=eml_cleartime
Plaintiff’s Attorneys:
Adam Zapala Cotchett, Pitre,
Judge/Arbitrator/Mediator:
Hon. Marianne O. Battani
Free Legal Help
If you or a loved one has suffered similar damages, please fill in the form at right and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.
Published on Aug-6-21