{"id":9530,"date":"2026-01-14T02:35:45","date_gmt":"2026-01-14T02:35:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/eeoc-opens-eeo-1-data-collection-and-cautions-employers-there-is-no-diversity-exception-to-title-vii\/"},"modified":"2026-01-15T17:43:05","modified_gmt":"2026-01-15T17:43:05","slug":"eeoc-opens-eeo-1-data-collection-and-cautions-employers-there-is-no-diversity-exception-to-title-vii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/eeoc-opens-eeo-1-data-collection-and-cautions-employers-there-is-no-diversity-exception-to-title-vii\/","title":{"rendered":"EEOC Opens EEO-1 Data Collection and Cautions Employers There Is No \u201cDiversity Exception\u201d to Title VII"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Updated August 6, 2025<\/strong>. On August 1, 2025, DOJ\u2019s Civil Rights Division announced it had terminated a 1981 court-ordered consent degree in Luevano<\/em> v. Ezell<\/em>. The press release<\/a> states that the consent decree \u201climited the hiring practices of the federal government based on flawed and outdated theories of diversity, equity, and inclusion\u201d and \u201cimposed draconian test review and implementation procedures on the Office of Personnel Management\u2014and consequently all other federal agencies\u2014requiring them to receive permission prior to using any tests for potential federal employees, in an attempt to require equal testing outcomes among all races of test-takers.\u201d On August 4, 2025, DOJ\u2019s Civil Rights Division issued a follow-up press release<\/a>, which provided a link to the case\u2019s dismissal<\/a> in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. While the termination of the Luevano<\/em> consent decree is limited to federal hiring, the termination reflects this Administration\u2019s policy, as articulated in an earlier executive order, seeking to eliminate disparate impact liability in all contexts to the maximum extent possible.<\/p>\n

*\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 *\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 *<\/p>\n

On May 20, 2025, U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (\u201cEEOC\u201d) Acting Chair Andrea Lucas announced the opening of the portal accepting EEO-1 demographic data reports. In the press release, Acting Chair Lucas cautioned employers that \u201c[t]here is no \u2018diversity\u2019 exception to Title VII\u2019s requirements,\u201d and stated that the EEOC going forward will prioritize \u201cremedying intentional discrimination claims.\u201d<\/p>\n

*\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 *\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 *<\/p>\n

The press release<\/a> sets June 24, 2025 as the deadline for 2024 EEO-1 Component 1 reporting submissions, and made it clear that date will not be extended. The release noted that this collection period is shorter than prior years as part of the EEOC\u2019s \u201cefforts to identify continued cost savings for the American public.\u201d This year, after receiving approval from the Office of Management and Budget, the EEOC eliminated the option of reporting the number of employees who self-identify as non-binary, and employers can now only report employees as male or female.<\/p>\n

In the press release, Acting Chair Lucas reminded employers that they \u201cmay not use information about [their] employees\u2019 race\/ethnicity or sex\u2014including demographic data [they] collect and report in EEO-1 Component 1 reports\u2014to facilitate unlawful employment discrimination based on race, sex, or other protected characteristics in violation of Title VII,\u201d and noted \u201c[t]here is no \u2018diversity\u2019 exception to Title VII\u2019s requirements.\u201d<\/p>\n

The press release also advises employers of the EEOC\u2019s intent to \u201cfully and robustly comply\u201d with President Trump\u2019s recent directive to federal agencies, including the EEOC, to deprioritize disparate impact theories of liability, including \u201cinvestigations and lawsuits that challenge neutral practices that have unequal outcomes based on race, sex, or other protected characteristics.\u201d Accordingly, Acting Chair Lucas stated that the EEOC, under her leadership, \u201cwill prioritize remedying intentional discrimination claims.\u201d The EEOC also explained that a disparate impact \u201cdoes not justify [a] company or organization treating any of [their] employees differently based on their race or sex.\u201d<\/p>\n

The press release concludes by stating that the \u201cEEOC is the sole federal agency authorized to investigate and litigate against private companies and other private employers for violations of federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination,\u201d and the EEOC \u201cis responsible for coordinating the federal government\u2019s employment antidiscrimination effort.\u201d The U.S. Department of Justice, on the other hand, recently made clear\u00a0its intent to \u201cvigorous[ly]\u201d use the False Claims Act in connection with its enforcement actions against private entities that are federal contractors or recipients of federal funds to the extent those entities have engaged in DEI activities that violate the civil rights laws.<\/p>\n

Employers should continue to closely monitor the changing political and legal landscape in this area.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n\n\n

Read More:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n