{"id":930,"date":"2024-05-23T15:55:17","date_gmt":"2024-05-23T15:55:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/mass-high-court-clarifies-role-in-assessing-initial-statement-of-damages\/"},"modified":"2024-05-23T17:49:34","modified_gmt":"2024-05-23T17:49:34","slug":"mass-high-court-clarifies-role-in-assessing-initial-statement-of-damages","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/mass-high-court-clarifies-role-in-assessing-initial-statement-of-damages\/","title":{"rendered":"Mass. High Court Clarifies Role in Assessing Initial Statement of Damages"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div>\n<p>In an issue evaluating procedures at the trial court level, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court\u00a0recently held that General Law c.\u00a0218,\u00a0Section 19A restricts a District or Boston Municipal Court\u00a0from looking beyond an initial statement of damages when determining if there is a reasonable likelihood that the plaintiff\u2019s recovery will exceed $50,000.<\/p>\n<p>Rather, the state high court concluded that the statute, which pertains to the statement of facts in support of civil action for damages, requires the trial court to consider the nature of the action and the complaint. The action for damages \u201cmay proceed\u201d in the District and Boston Municipal Courts, rather than in Superior Court, if there is no likelihood that recovery will exceed $50,000, the\u00a0a\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/drive.google.com\/file\/d\/14Ubu4TomrTxzVTj9mqKSnwsR1C6KmSfC\/view?usp=sharing\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">May 20 opinion<\/a>\u00a0said.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In an issue evaluating procedures at the trial court level, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court\u00a0recently held that General Law c.\u00a0218,\u00a0Section 19A restricts a District or Boston Municipal Court\u00a0from [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":931,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[1331,1329,143,532,327,1336,1332,801,1330,1333],"class_list":["post-930","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-lawyers","tag-assessing","tag-clarifies","tag-court","tag-damages","tag-high","tag-high-court","tag-initial","tag-mass","tag-role","tag-statement"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/930","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=930"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/930\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":936,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/930\/revisions\/936"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/931"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=930"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=930"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=930"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}