{"id":8048,"date":"2025-10-09T15:04:21","date_gmt":"2025-10-09T15:04:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/ftc-sues-zillow-and-redfin-over-alleged-anticompetitive-agreement-in-rental-advertising-market-justia-news-october-2-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-10-11T07:32:44","modified_gmt":"2025-10-11T07:32:44","slug":"ftc-sues-zillow-and-redfin-over-alleged-anticompetitive-agreement-in-rental-advertising-market-justia-news-october-2-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/ftc-sues-zillow-and-redfin-over-alleged-anticompetitive-agreement-in-rental-advertising-market-justia-news-october-2-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"FTC Sues Zillow and Redfin Over Alleged Anticompetitive Agreement in Rental Advertising Market \u2014 Justia News \u2014 October 2, 2025"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n

The Federal Trade Commission filed a lawsuit on September 30, 2025, against real estate companies Zillow and Redfin, alleging the companies entered into an illegal agreement that eliminates competition in the online rental advertising market.<\/span><\/p>\n

According to the FTC\u2019s complaint, on February 6, 2025, Zillow paid Redfin $100 million as part of an agreement in which Redfin would exit the internet listing services (ILS) advertising market for multifamily rental properties, terminate its existing advertising contracts, and transition those customers to Zillow.<\/span><\/p>\n

The deal involves properties with 25 units or more and prohibits Redfin from competing in multifamily rental advertising for up to nine years. Under the arrangement, Redfin\u2019s websites will serve as a syndicator of Zillow listings.<\/span><\/p>\n

Just after announcing the plan, Redfin terminated hundreds of employees and agreed to help Zillow hire its preferred workers from those who were fired.<\/span><\/p>\n

The FTC alleges that Zillow and Redfin\u2019s agreement violates Section 1 of the Sherman Act and Section 7 of the Clayton Act. The complaint states that the arrangement is \u201cnothing more than an end run around competition\u201d that eliminates head-to-head competition between two of the three leading providers of ILS advertising.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cZillow paid millions of dollars to eliminate Redfin as an independent competitor in an already concentrated advertising market \u2014 one that\u2019s critical for renters, property managers, and the health of the overall U.S. housing market,\u201d said Daniel Guarnera, Director of the FTC\u2019s Bureau of Competition.<\/span><\/p>\n

The FTC\u2019s complaint details that Redfin was required to turn over competitively sensitive information to Zillow, including customer details. Redfin also provided information to facilitate Zillow\u2019s hiring of fired employees and customer transitions.<\/span><\/p>\n

The FTC alleges the agreement will likely lead to higher prices and worse terms for multifamily unit advertising, and will reduce incentives for Zillow and Redfin to compete for renters by investing in improved user experience and visitor engagement.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

According to the complaint, advertising customers who used both platforms may face immediate price increases, as those who paid for preferred placement on Redfin\u2019s sites may now require more expensive subscription tiers to gain comparable visibility on Zillow\u2019s platform.<\/span><\/p>\n

The FTC is seeking to stop Zillow and Redfin from continuing the agreement and the potential divestiture of assets or business reconstruction to restore competition.<\/span><\/p>\n

Additional Reading<\/b><\/p>\n

FTC Sues Zillow and Redfin Over Illegal Agreement to Suppress Rental Advertising Competition<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>Federal Trade Commission<\/span><\/i> (September 30, 2025)<\/span><\/p>\n

FTC Sues Zillow and Redfin over deal it accuses of suppressing competition in rental ads<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>AP News <\/span><\/i>(September 30, 2025)<\/span><\/p>\n

Image Credit: <\/b>Tada Images \/ Shutterstock.com<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n