{"id":8024,"date":"2025-10-07T08:55:31","date_gmt":"2025-10-07T08:55:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/live-nation-denied-supreme-court-review-in-ticketbuyer-class-action\/"},"modified":"2025-10-11T07:48:27","modified_gmt":"2025-10-11T07:48:27","slug":"live-nation-denied-supreme-court-review-in-ticketbuyer-class-action","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/live-nation-denied-supreme-court-review-in-ticketbuyer-class-action\/","title":{"rendered":"Live Nation Denied Supreme Court Review In Ticketbuyer Class Action"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-margin-lr-auto  lrv-a-font-body-m   \">Live Nation Denied Supreme Court Review In Ticketbuyer Class Action &#8211; The U.S. Supreme Court won\u2019t hear a case against Live Nation over the company\u2019s use of arbitration agreements for ticket buyers, leaving in place a ruling last year that called the provisions \u201copaque and unfair.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-margin-lr-auto  lrv-a-font-body-m   \">The concert giant had asked the justices to tackle the case and overturn that strongly-worded decision, arguing it \u201ccreates massive uncertainty\u201d for the many companies that have long required consumers to sign such clauses.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-margin-lr-auto  lrv-a-font-body-m   \">But in an order issued Monday, the Supreme Court denied Live Nation\u2019s request; as is typical, it did not issue any explanation for the decision. The justices hear only a tiny fraction of the thousands of petitions they receive each year.<\/p>\n<div class=\"injected-related-story \/\/ lrv-u-align-items-center u-align-items-flex-start@mobile-max  lrv-u-background-color-grey-lightest  lrv-u-flex lrv-u-flex-direction-column@mobile-max u-width-710@desktop lrv-u-margin-lr-auto lrv-u-margin-tb-1 u-margin-b-250@mobile-max u-margin-t-275@mobile-max u-margin-t-250@desktop u-margin-b-250@desktop u-margin-lr-n1@mobile-max lrv-u-border-b-1 lrv-u-border-color-brand-secondary-dark lrv-u-border-t-1 lrv-u-padding-tb-1  lrv-u-padding-tb-1@mobile-max lrv-u-padding-r-1@mobile-max lrv-u-padding-l-00@mobile-max u-grid-gap-18@desktop u-grid-gap-0@mobile-max\">\n<p>Related<\/p>\n<div class=\"injected-related-story-wrapper lrv-u-flex lrv-u-justify-content-space-between  a-children-border-vertical a-children-border--grey a-children-border-width-050\">\n<div class=\"o-card  lrv-u-width-100p\">\n<div class=\"o-card__image-wrap lrv-u-flex-shrink-0 u-width-191 u-width-150@mobile-max\">\n<div class=\"c-lazy-image   lrv-u-margin-b-00@mobile-max u-width-130px@mobile-max lrv-u-margin-b-00@mobile-max\">\n<div class=\"a-crop-6x4 a-crop-3x2@mobile-max\">\n<p><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-margin-lr-auto  lrv-a-font-body-m   \">Filed as a class action in 2022 on behalf of \u201chundreds of thousands if not millions\u201d of ticket buyers, the lawsuit claims Live Nation and Ticketmaster violated federal antitrust laws by abusing their dominance to charge \u201cextraordinarily high\u201d prices to consumers.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-margin-lr-auto  lrv-a-font-body-m   \">Faced with those allegations, Live Nation argued that fans had waived their right to sue in court when they bought their tickets because they had signed arbitration agreements \u2014 a common requirement when purchasing tickets and other services from many companies.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-margin-lr-auto  lrv-a-font-body-m   \">In rejecting that argument in October, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that Live Nation\u2019s agreements were \u201cunconscionable and unenforceable\u201d since they would make it \u201cimpossible\u201d for fans to fairly pursue claims against the company.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-margin-lr-auto  lrv-a-font-body-m   \">The criticism centered on Live Nation\u2019s decision to alter its terms of use to require fans to submit to \u201cmass arbitration.\u201d Offered by an upstart arbitration firm called New Era ADR, the new process was aimed at handling many cases at once rather than individually, which Live Nation believed was necessitated by aggressive tactics from lawyers representing huge numbers of concertgoers. But the appeals court said it was clearly unfair to the fans.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-margin-lr-auto  lrv-a-font-body-m   \">\u201cForced to accept terms that can be changed without notice, a plaintiff then must arbitrate under \u2026 opaque and unfair rules,\u201d the appeals court wrote at the time. \u201cThe rules and the terms are so overly harsh or one-sided as to unequivocally represent a systematic effort to impose arbitration as an inferior forum.\u201d<\/p>\n<div class=\"injected-related-story \/\/ lrv-u-align-items-center u-align-items-flex-start@mobile-max  lrv-u-background-color-grey-lightest  lrv-u-flex lrv-u-flex-direction-column@mobile-max u-width-710@desktop lrv-u-margin-lr-auto lrv-u-margin-tb-1 u-margin-b-250@mobile-max u-margin-t-275@mobile-max u-margin-t-250@desktop u-margin-b-250@desktop u-margin-lr-n1@mobile-max lrv-u-border-b-1 lrv-u-border-color-brand-secondary-dark lrv-u-border-t-1 lrv-u-padding-tb-1  lrv-u-padding-tb-1@mobile-max lrv-u-padding-r-1@mobile-max lrv-u-padding-l-00@mobile-max u-grid-gap-18@desktop u-grid-gap-0@mobile-max\">\n<p>Related<\/p>\n<div class=\"injected-related-story-wrapper lrv-u-flex lrv-u-justify-content-space-between  a-children-border-vertical a-children-border--grey a-children-border-width-050\">\n<div class=\"o-card  lrv-u-width-100p\">\n<div class=\"o-card__image-wrap lrv-u-flex-shrink-0 u-width-191 u-width-150@mobile-max\">\n<div class=\"c-lazy-image   lrv-u-margin-b-00@mobile-max u-width-130px@mobile-max lrv-u-margin-b-00@mobile-max\">\n<div class=\"a-crop-6x4 a-crop-3x2@mobile-max\">\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"c-lazy-image__img lrv-u-background-color-grey-lightest lrv-u-width-100p lrv-u-display-block lrv-u-height-auto\" src=\"https:\/\/www.billboard.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Ryan-Hyeong-Woo-Noh-hybe-billboard-1800.jpg?w=237&amp;h=147&amp;crop=1\" srcset=\"\" alt=\"Ryan Hyeong Woo Noh\" width=\"\" height=\"\" data-lazy-sizes=\"auto\" title=\"\"><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-margin-lr-auto  lrv-a-font-body-m   \">In asking the Supreme Court to review that ruling, Live Nation called it a \u201cdeeply flawed decision\u201d that exemplified the kind of \u201cjudicial hostility\u201d to private arbitration that\u2019s prohibited under federal law.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-margin-lr-auto  lrv-a-font-body-m   \">\u201cThe Ninth Circuit\u2019s decision below flouts [federal arbitration law], defies this court\u2019s precedents, and threatens to block sensible measures for addressing the new phenomenon of mass arbitration filings,\u201d the company\u2019s lawyers wrote.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-margin-lr-auto  lrv-a-font-body-m   \">Following the Supreme Court\u2019s rejection of the case, the lawsuit will now return to a federal court, where the concertgoers\u2019 antitrust allegations against Live Nation will now proceed into litigation. Neither side immediately returned requests for comment on Monday.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/ubpass.co\/billboard\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" style=\"max-width: 100%; height: auto;\" src=\"https:\/\/i.imgur.com\/2HpFicp.png\" alt=\"Billboard VIP Pass\" title=\"\"><br \/>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Live Nation Denied Supreme Court Review In Ticketbuyer Class Action &#8211; The U.S. Supreme Court won\u2019t hear a case against Live Nation over the company\u2019s use of arbitration [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":8025,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[715,650,143,2791,344,1206,2266,533,6853],"class_list":["post-8024","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-lawyers","tag-action","tag-class","tag-court","tag-denied","tag-live","tag-nation","tag-review","tag-supreme","tag-ticketbuyer"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8024","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8024"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8024\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8111,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8024\/revisions\/8111"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8025"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8024"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8024"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8024"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}