{"id":4817,"date":"2025-03-20T23:38:15","date_gmt":"2025-03-20T23:38:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/appellate-court-rejects-municipal-judges-claimed-authority-to-order-competency-evaluations\/"},"modified":"2025-03-20T23:38:15","modified_gmt":"2025-03-20T23:38:15","slug":"appellate-court-rejects-municipal-judges-claimed-authority-to-order-competency-evaluations","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/appellate-court-rejects-municipal-judges-claimed-authority-to-order-competency-evaluations\/","title":{"rendered":"Appellate Court Rejects Municipal Judge&#8217;s Claimed Authority to Order Competency Evaluations"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div data-v-e97bc92c=\"\">\n<div data-v-e97bc92c=\"\">\n<p>A Missouri Court of Appeals panel denied a Kansas City judge&#8217;s claim this week that he had the authority to order the state&#8217;s mental health department to complete competency evaluations on a dozen defendants accused of violating municipal ordinances. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>  <!----> <!----> <!----><\/p>\n<div data-v-e97bc92c=\"\">\n<p>The Missouri Court of Appeals for the Western District denied Kansas City Municipal Judge Michael C. Heffernon&#8217;s attempts to appeal a writ of prohibition that prohibited him from ordering the Department of Mental Health (DMH) to complete evaluations on 12 defendants accused of violating city ordinances. Heffernon appealed a final judgment by the Jackson County Circuit Court, which ruled that he did not have such authority under Missouri Revised Statutes Section 552.020, which outlines criminal proceedings involving mental illness. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p> <!----> <!----> <!----> <!----><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A Missouri Court of Appeals panel denied a Kansas City judge&#8217;s claim this week that he had the authority to order the state&#8217;s mental health department to complete [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4818,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[1389,2475,5176,5177,143,5178,915,2368,1574,697],"class_list":["post-4817","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-lawyers","tag-appellate","tag-authority","tag-claimed","tag-competency","tag-court","tag-evaluations","tag-judges","tag-municipal","tag-order","tag-rejects"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4817","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4817"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4817\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4818"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4817"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4817"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4817"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}