{"id":4783,"date":"2025-03-18T20:19:04","date_gmt":"2025-03-18T20:19:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/judge-denies-post-trial-motions-in-chip-designers-ma-row-bringing-judgment-to-more-than-41-million\/"},"modified":"2025-03-18T20:19:04","modified_gmt":"2025-03-18T20:19:04","slug":"judge-denies-post-trial-motions-in-chip-designers-ma-row-bringing-judgment-to-more-than-41-million","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/judge-denies-post-trial-motions-in-chip-designers-ma-row-bringing-judgment-to-more-than-41-million\/","title":{"rendered":"Judge Denies Post-Trial Motions in Chip Designers&#8217; M&#038;A Row, Bringing Judgment to More Than $41 Million"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div data-v-e97bc92c=\"\">\n<div data-v-e97bc92c=\"\">\n<p>A California state judge has denied the post-trial motions filed by chip design software company Silvaco in its long-running earn-out dispute with an international business it acquired in 2018, Nangate Denmark ApS, bringing Nangate&#8217;s judgment against Silvaco to over $41 million. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>  <!----> <!----> <!----><\/p>\n<div data-v-e97bc92c=\"\">\n<p>California Superior Court Judge Charles F. Adams, who presides in Santa Clara County, last week rejected Silvaco&#8217;s motions for judgment notwithstanding verdict and a new trial, including a request for a reduction in punitive damages, after a two-hour oral argument held by Nangate&#8217;s counsel at Goodwin Procter on March 7. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p> <!----> <!----> <!----> <!----><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A California state judge has denied the post-trial motions filed by chip design software company Silvaco in its long-running earn-out dispute with an international business it acquired in [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4784,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[3463,2778,1242,2779,423,467,1159,1724,5146,4056],"class_list":["post-4783","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-lawyers","tag-bringing","tag-chip","tag-denies","tag-designers","tag-judge","tag-judgment","tag-million","tag-motions","tag-posttrial","tag-row"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4783","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4783"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4783\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4784"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4783"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4783"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4783"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}