{"id":418,"date":"2024-04-30T04:17:30","date_gmt":"2024-04-30T04:17:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/new-york-city-settles-lawsuit-concerning-forced-removal-of-religious-head-coverings-in-mugshot-photos-justia-news-april-10-2024\/"},"modified":"2024-04-30T08:45:53","modified_gmt":"2024-04-30T08:45:53","slug":"new-york-city-settles-lawsuit-concerning-forced-removal-of-religious-head-coverings-in-mugshot-photos-justia-news-april-10-2024","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/new-york-city-settles-lawsuit-concerning-forced-removal-of-religious-head-coverings-in-mugshot-photos-justia-news-april-10-2024\/","title":{"rendered":"New York City Settles Lawsuit Concerning Forced Removal of Religious Head Coverings in Mugshot Photos \u2014 Justia News \u2014 April 10, 2024"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

On Friday, April 5, 2024, New York City agreed to pay $17.5 million to settle a class action lawsuit brought by two Muslim women forced to remove their religious head coverings for New York Police Department post-arrest photos.<\/p>\n

Jamilla Clark was arrested by the NYPD in January 2017 for violating a protective order filed by her ex-husband. Clark alleged that NYPD officers \u201cthreatened to prosecute her if she did not remove her hijab,\u201d which she wore daily to cover her hair and signify her devotion to her faith, for the mugshot photo. Eight months later, Arwa Aziz was arrested for violating a protective order filed by her sister-in-law. Aziz alleged that she was forced to take mugshot photos for nearly five minutes with her hijab removed. When Aziz requested that she be permitted to keep her hijab on but pushed back slightly to expose her hairline and ears, officers refused and replied \u201c[i]t\u2019s the law<\/a>.\u201d<\/p>\n

In March 2015, the NYPD implemented Interim Order 29, which established \u201cprotocols for taking post-arrest photographs for arrestees who refuse to remove their religious head coverings in the presence of NYPD officers.\u201d Interim Order 29 amended Patrol Guide 208-03 by requiring \u201cthat Desk Officers take certain steps if an arrestee \u2018indicates a refusal to remove their religious head covering for the official Department photograph at borough Court Section.\u201d The order also required that the Borough Court Section Supervisor follow the same steps as the Desk Officer. The complaint filed by Clark and Aziz alleged that \u201cthe NYPD does not consistently apply its Booking Photograph policy as set forth in Interim Order 29.\u201d<\/p>\n

The complaint alleged that the NYPD\u2019s policy \u201chas had an extensive and corrosive effect on Muslim-American women in New York City. . . [and] is a profound manifestation of insensitivity towards religious practices and interests.\u201d The complaint cited causes of action for (1) violations of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (42 U.S.C. \u00a7 2000cc); (2) violations of the Free Exercise Clause (42 U.S.C. \u00a7 1983); (3) violations of the New York State Constitution, Article I, Section 3; and (4) declaratory judgment under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 57, and 28 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a7 2201-02.<\/p>\n

Two other Muslim women, Gehad Elsayed and Laila Ibrahim, sued the city and two NYPD officers in 2018 after they were forced to remove their hijabs for post-arrest photos. Elsayed and Ibrahim settled their lawsuit in 2020. In response to the two lawsuits brought by the four women, the NYPD agreed to change its post-arrest photo policy to allow people to wear religious head coverings during booking photos. The policy still allows for very limited exceptions in cases where the head covering obscures being able to see a person\u2019s full facial features.<\/p>\n

The preliminary settlement announced on Friday includes 3,600 class members, including men and women forced to remove their religious head coverings for post-arrest photos. The class members will be eligible for payments of approximately $7,000 to $13,000. Surveillance Technology Oversight Project Executive Director Albert Fox Cahn said, \u201cThe NYPD should have never stripped these religious New Yorkers of their head coverings and dignity. . . Money can\u2019t fully undo this trauma, but it sends a powerful message that the NYPD can\u2019t violate New Yorkers\u2019 First Amendment rights without paying a price.\u201d<\/p>\n

Additional Reading<\/strong><\/p>\n

NYC agrees to $17.5 million settlement over forced removal of hijabs for mugshot photos<\/a>, Courthouse News Service<\/em> (April 5, 2024)<\/p>\n

NYPD Sued Over Ban on Headscarves in Mug Shots<\/a>, Courthouse News Service<\/em> (March 16, 2018)<\/p>\n

NYPD will now allow people to wear religious head coverings in booking photos<\/a>, CNN<\/em> (November 11, 2020)<\/p>\n

Clark et al v. City of New York<\/a><\/em> (Case No. 1:2018cv02334)<\/p>\n

Complaint in Clark et al v. City of New York<\/em><\/p>\n

Photo Credit: <\/strong>Kristi Blokhin \/ Shutterstock.com<\/p>\n<\/div>\n