{"id":3845,"date":"2025-01-24T01:48:03","date_gmt":"2025-01-24T01:48:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/trumps-executive-order-on-birthright-citizenship-temporarily-blocked-justia-news-january-23-2025\/"},"modified":"2025-01-24T01:48:03","modified_gmt":"2025-01-24T01:48:03","slug":"trumps-executive-order-on-birthright-citizenship-temporarily-blocked-justia-news-january-23-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/trumps-executive-order-on-birthright-citizenship-temporarily-blocked-justia-news-january-23-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump\u2019s Executive Order on Birthright Citizenship Temporarily Blocked \u2014 Justia News \u2014 January 23, 2025"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div itemprop=\"articleBody\">\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">On January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump issued an executive order redefining birthright citizenship, a policy historically guaranteed under the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The order, which would deny citizenship to children born in the United States to parents without legal status or on temporary visas, was immediately met with widespread legal challenges. Just three days later, U.S. District Judge John Coughenour temporarily blocked the order, labeling it \u201cblatantly unconstitutional\u201d during a court hearing in Seattle.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The executive order asserts that children born in the United States to non-citizen parents who are either unlawfully present or in the country temporarily are not \u201csubject to the jurisdiction\u201d of the U.S. As such, they would no longer be eligible for citizenship at birth. The Trump administration defended the order as a correction to what it perceives as a misinterpretation of the 14th Amendment, emphasizing that citizenship is a \u201cpriceless and profound gift\u201d that should not be extended universally.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Under the order, federal agencies were instructed to deny or revoke citizenship documentation for individuals born under these conditions. The policy was set to apply to children born 30 days after the order was signed.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The order quickly faced opposition from states and civil rights groups. Four states \u2014 Arizona, Illinois, Oregon, and Washington \u2014 filed a lawsuit to block the order, arguing that it directly violated the Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment. This clause states that \u201call persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.\u201d\u200b\u200b<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">During the hearing, Judge Coughenour expressed skepticism about the administration\u2019s legal reasoning. \u201cThis is a blatantly unconstitutional order,\u201d he stated, citing his four decades of experience on the bench. The judge also noted that the order could cause immediate harm, requiring states to overhaul systems for healthcare and other benefits to reconsider applicants\u2019 citizenship status.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Department of Justice announced plans to \u201cvigorously defend\u201d the executive order, asserting that it correctly interprets the Constitution. A spokesperson for the DOJ emphasized that the administration looks forward to presenting its case in court\u200b.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Meanwhile, attorneys general from the opposing states celebrated the ruling. Washington Attorney General Nick Brown called the judge\u2019s decision \u201cstep one\u201d in preventing an \u201cunconstitutional and un-American\u201d policy. He also highlighted the urgency of the issue, pointing out that children are born every day who could be affected by such policies.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Additional Reading<\/b><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2025\/01\/23\/g-s1-44411\/birthright-citizenship-immigration-trump-border\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">U.S. judge temporarily blocks Trump\u2019s birthright citizenship order<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">NPR<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> (January 23, 2025)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/apnews.com\/article\/birthright-citizenship-donald-trump-lawsuit-immigration-9ac27b234c854a68a9b9f8c0d6cd8a1c\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A federal judge temporarily blocks Trump\u2019s executive order redefining birthright citizenship<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AP News <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(January 23, 2025)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/presidential-actions\/2025\/01\/protecting-the-meaning-and-value-of-american-citizenship\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship, Executive Order<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">White House <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(January 20, 2025)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Image Credit: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">CASTALDOstudo.com \/ Shutterstock.com<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><script>(function(d, s, id) {\n            var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];\n            if (d.getElementById(id)) return;\n            js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;\n            js.src=\"https:\/\/connect.facebook.net\/en_US\/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.11&appId=1639788792774312&autoLogAppEvents=1\";\n            fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);\n        }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));<\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump issued an executive order redefining birthright citizenship, a policy historically guaranteed under the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The order, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3846,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[4397,1286,4398,3971,3326,309,310,1574,4399,963],"class_list":["post-3845","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-lawyers","tag-birthright","tag-blocked","tag-citizenship","tag-executive","tag-january","tag-justia","tag-news","tag-order","tag-temporarily","tag-trumps"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3845","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3845"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3845\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3846"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3845"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3845"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3845"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}