{"id":2065,"date":"2024-07-31T13:45:49","date_gmt":"2024-07-31T13:45:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/federal-judge-rejects-dysons-motion-to-dismiss-patent-infringement-claims\/"},"modified":"2024-07-31T13:45:49","modified_gmt":"2024-07-31T13:45:49","slug":"federal-judge-rejects-dysons-motion-to-dismiss-patent-infringement-claims","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/federal-judge-rejects-dysons-motion-to-dismiss-patent-infringement-claims\/","title":{"rendered":"Federal Judge Rejects Dyson&#8217;s Motion to Dismiss Patent Infringement Claims"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div>\n<p>A\u00a0federal judge\u00a0has rejected the \u201cnovel argument\u201d Kirkland &amp; Ellis made in an attempt to dismiss patent infringement claims that a major industry competitor\u00a0brought against its client, Dyson.<\/p>\n<p>Counsel with Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr and Gibson, Dunn &amp; Crutcher, filed the lawsuit on behalf of\u00a0the global appliance company in U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. While SharkNinja sought a declaratory judgment that its FlexStyle haircare product does not infringe on Dyson\u2019s competing AirWrap product,\u00a0the plaintiff filed a second amended complaint accusing Dyson of issuing up to nine product lines that all infringed on eight vacuum patents belonging to SharkNinja\u2019s exclusive partner, Omachron Alpha.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A\u00a0federal judge\u00a0has rejected the \u201cnovel argument\u201d Kirkland &amp; Ellis made in an attempt to dismiss patent infringement claims that a major industry competitor\u00a0brought against its client, Dyson. Counsel [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2066,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[300,299,2789,554,892,423,298,891,697],"class_list":["post-2065","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-lawyers","tag-claims","tag-dismiss","tag-dysons","tag-federal","tag-infringement","tag-judge","tag-motion","tag-patent","tag-rejects"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2065","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2065"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2065\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2066"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2065"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2065"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2065"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}