{"id":10309,"date":"2026-04-15T21:19:52","date_gmt":"2026-04-15T21:19:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/ticketmaster-loses-blockbuster-antitrust-trial\/"},"modified":"2026-04-15T21:19:52","modified_gmt":"2026-04-15T21:19:52","slug":"ticketmaster-loses-blockbuster-antitrust-trial","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/ticketmaster-loses-blockbuster-antitrust-trial\/","title":{"rendered":"Ticketmaster Loses Blockbuster Antitrust Trial"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n

\n\tA jury found Wednesday (April 15) that Live Nation and Ticketmaster violated federal and state antitrust laws by dominating the live music industry, capping off a blockbuster trial with a verdict that could ultimately see the two concert giants broken up.<\/p>\n

\n\tAfter a five-week trial in Manhattan federal court, jurors sided with a coalition of state attorneys general who sued Live Nation. The states argued during closing statements that the concert giant was a \u201cmonopolistic bully\u201d that had harmed competition and driven up ticket prices for fans.<\/p>\n

\n

\n

\t\t\t\t\tRelated\t\t<\/p>\n<\/h3>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n\tIn its verdict, the jury handed Live Nation a total defeat \u2014 finding that the company illegally monopolized the market for ticketing services, concert ticketing and the use of amphitheaters, and that it illegally tied the use of its venues to its concert promotion services. The jury said fans overpaid by $1.72 per ticket.<\/p>\n

\n\tFollowing the verdict, all eyes will turn to Judge Arun Subramanian, who must now decide whether to order Live Nation to sell off Ticketmaster \u2014 something critics have long demanded and the states have said is the goal of their case. Such orders are drastic and rare, though, and the judge could instead merely ban certain anti-competitive conduct.<\/p>\n

\n\tLive Nation is certain to challenge the outcome, first to Subramanian and then to a federal appeals court.<\/p>\n

\n\tNew York Attorney General Letitia James<\/strong> celebrated the verdict as a \u201clandmark victory\u201d in a statement Wednesday. <\/p>\n

\n\t\u201cFor far too long, Live Nation and Ticketmaster have taken advantage of fans and artists by raising prices for tickets and stifling any competition that threatened their power,\u201d said James. \u201cA jury found what we have long known to be true: Live Nation and Ticketmaster are breaking the law and costing consumers millions of dollars in the process. I am proud to have led a bipartisan coalition of attorneys general in bringing this case and look forward to continuing our work to hold Live Nation and Ticketmaster accountable.\u201d<\/p>\n

\n\tReps for Live Nation did not immediately return a request for comment.<\/p>\n

\n\tThe U.S. Department of Justice and dozens of states sued in 2024, 14 years after Live Nation and Ticketmaster merged with the blessing of federal antitrust regulators. The feds claimed the company had since grown into a monopoly that illegally dominated the live music industry: \u201cIt is time to break it up,\u201d said then-attorney general Merrick Garland.<\/p>\n

\n\tBut a week after the trial started last month, DOJ agreed to a surprise settlement with Live Nation \u2014 a move that reportedly came after President Donald Trump personally pushed for it<\/a>. The deal required key changes in business practices but, crucially, would not require the company to divest Ticketmaster. Following that, dozens of states said that settlement was insufficient, and instead pushed ahead with the trial.<\/p>\n

\n\tOver five weeks of testimony, jurors heard from venue bosses like former Barclays Center CEO John Abbamondi<\/strong>, who claimed Live Nation threatened to divert concerts if he switched to rival ticketer SeatGeek. Live Nation CEO Michael Rapino<\/strong> later took the stand, where he denied such threats and said his company had simply outperformed its rivals to achieve its success: \u201cI\u2019m very proud.\u201d<\/p>\n

\n\tJurors also heard from AEG Presents CEO Jay Marciano<\/strong>; current Barclays Center boss Laurie Jacoby<\/strong>; several other sports execs, promoters and venue operators; multiple Live Nation and Ticketmaster execs, like president of touring Omar Al-joulani<\/strong>; Drake\u2019s manager Adel Nur<\/strong>, also known as Future The Prince; and numerous economists and other expert witnesses.<\/p>\n

\n\tLive Nation, repped at trial by a team from the law firm Latham & Watkins, tried to persuade the jury that the company had secured its massive market share over the past 15 years not through anti-competitive behavior, but by simply being better than its rivals. During his closing statements, Live Nation attorney David Marriott <\/strong>called his client a \u201cfierce competitor.\u201d<\/p>\n

\n\tBut the states, led by veteran antitrust litigator Jeffrey Kessler<\/strong>, told the jury a very different story: that Live Nation and Ticketmaster had abused their position to enrich themselves at the expense of fans. They cited much-publicized Slack messages in which two Live Nation execs joked about \u201ctaking advantage\u201d of \u201cstupid\u201d fans with prices and fees: \u201cRobbing them blind baby. That\u2019s how we do.\u201d<\/p>\n

\n\t\u201cWho talks like this? What type of company uses this language?\u201d Kessler asked the jury in closing statements on Thursday (April 9). \u201cThe answer, I think you will find, is a monopolist who views itself to be above the law.\u201d<\/p>\n

\n\tWith Wednesday\u2019s verdict, the jury showed that argument worked. It took them four days to deliberate, sifting through weeks of testimony and mountains of evidence submitted by both sides. As is typical with verdicts, there was no stated explanation for why the jurors sided with the states.<\/p>\n


\"Billboard
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A jury found Wednesday (April 15) that Live Nation and Ticketmaster violated federal and state antitrust laws by dominating the live music industry, capping off a blockbuster trial […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10310,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[358,7735,1318,1345,342],"class_list":["post-10309","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-lawyers","tag-antitrust","tag-blockbuster","tag-loses","tag-ticketmaster","tag-trial"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10309","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10309"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10309\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10310"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10309"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10309"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/usatrustedlawyers.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10309"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}