The Offspring Defeat Ex-Drummer’s Appeal Over $35M Catalog Sale

A California appeals court has sided with The Offspring in a long-running court case filed by former drummer Ron Welty, rejecting his claims that he was owed millions more from the punk band’s $35 million catalog sale.

Welty’s lawsuit alleged that lead singer Bryan “Dexter” Holland had tried to “erase” his contributions to the Offspring, including by shorting him on the proceeds of the band’s 2015 catalog sale to Round Hill Music. But a Los Angeles judge rejected those accusations last year.

Best accident lawyer near me | Civil Litigation Lawyer near me | Consumer Protection Lawyer near me | Best Bankruptcy lawyers near me | Best Birth Injury lawyers near me | Bus Accident Lawyers Near Me | Best Car accident lawyer near me |  | Drunk driving accident lawyers near me | Best Dui Lawyers near me |  |  | Best Tax Lawyers near me | Best Truck accident Lawyers near me | Best Workers compensation Lawyers near me | Best Wrongful Death Lawyers near me

In a ruling Wednesday, Californai’s Court of Appeals upheld that ruling, saying there had been “no reversible error” in the lower judge’s decision. Welty raised numerous challenges to how the lower judge had handled the case, but the appeals court was not convinced by any of them: “The judgment and order are affirmed.

Welty joined The Offspring in 1987 and served as the band’s drummer during its heyday, including on its 1998 album Americana that reached No. 2 on the Billboard 200, before leaving the band in 2003 on undisclosed terms.

In his sweeping 2020 lawsuit, Welty accused Holland and the other members of numerous forms of wrongdoing: “This lawsuit seeks, among other things, redress for The Offspring’s failure to pay Mr. Welty his rightful share of the band’s proceeds and a prohibition against their ongoing efforts to harm Mr. Welty, his legacy with the band, and his ongoing career.”Best Personal injury Lawyers near me | Best Police brutality Lawyers near me | Best Probate Lawyers near meSexual harassment Lawyers near me | Best Social security disability Lawyers near me

Among other allegations, Welty claimed he had been entitled to a bigger cut of the Round Hill deal, in which the company paid $20 million for the rights to the band’s recorded masters — split among the band’s key performers — and another $15 million for the publishing rights, paid directly to Holland.

Welty claimed he deserved some of that publishing money, and argued in his lawsuit that he was owed at least $2.8 million more from the Round Hill transaction. But at a bench trial in 2022, Judge William F. Fahey largely rejected those accusations, calling some them “completely illogical.” During the proceedings, other members of The Offspring had testified that the structure of the deal was fair since Holland had written all of the band’s music.

Best Child custody lawyers near me | Child support lawyers near me | Best Copyright lawyers near me | Best Divorce lawyers near me | Best Criminal Defense Lawyers Near Me

In a written decision last year, Fahey ruled that the deal had been “structured in accordance with industry standards” and that Welty had failed to prove that he was entitled to a cut of Holland’s $15 million: “It is hard even to envision a reason why these two other band members would agree to such a structure unless they believed that Holland was the creator and owner of the music compositions.”

In March, the judge issued a final judgment in favor of the band, finalizing the earlier rulings and rejecting the rest of Welty’s claims. It was that ruling that was affirmed by Wednesday’s decision at the appeals court.

Elder law Lawyers near me | Best Employment law Lawyers near me | Estate planning Lawyers near me | Best Family law Lawyers near me | Best Foreclosure Lawyers near me | Best Immigration Lawyers near me | Best Insurance claims Lawyers near me | Best Medical malpractice Lawyers near me | Best Mesothelioma Lawyers near me | | Nursing home abuse Lawyers near me

Following the appellate ruling, an attorney for Offspring declined to comment. An attorney for Welty did not return a request for comment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *